Know the Text
☰
⌕
SeekQuestion

Reading as Seek: to learn Scripture and its teachings. Same facts, warmer framing. Read as Question →

← Questions

⚠ Fact-checked, not yet reviewed by a person.

Is the 'eye of the needle' a gate in Jerusalem?

Question guide

Fact-checked · Version 1 · Revised · How this page was madedrafting: Version 1, written from a research ledger of 80 sourced claims (content/work/matthew-19-24), each checked by a second AI from a different vendor before writing (56 verified, 24 corrected); every fact-bearing item cites the claims it relies onreview: An editor from a different AI vendor than the writer reviewed the draft against its claims and rebuilt the five hard questions (the gate, rope or cable, the Talmud's elephant, wealth itself, and softening) so that each states its case at full strength with named voices: the gate case from the gloss attributed to Anselm, Hugh of Saint-Cher, Poloner, Nugent and Moss; the rope case from Cyril, Theophylact's 'some', Calvin, Bain as Lorah quotes him, Lamsa as Insight reports him and Ibn Abbas's reading of Qur'an 7:40. The editor kept the gate's history to what Ziemińska documents, replaced an overstated 'contested' agreement row with the named writers who reject the gate, added the Catechism, Chrysostom and Metropolitan Hilarion as answers on wealth, and added the Mark 10:24 'trust in riches' reading and Colavito's motive claim as misconceptions; a code check compares every item with its cited claims; owner sign-off pending

Jesus' hearers ask who can be saved, and he says God can do what people cannot; Ziemińska found no ancient evidence of a needle gate.9 sources9 sources1. Matthew 19:252. Mark 10:263. Luke 18:264. Matthew 19:265. Mark 10:276. Luke 18:277. Ziemińska 20228. Ziemińska 20229. this site's data

In all three Gospels Jesus tells a wealthy man to sell his possessions, give to the poor and follow him, then gives the camel-and-needle comparison. His hearers ask who then can be saved, and he answers that God can do what people cannot. ChrysostomJohn ChrysostomBishop of Constantinople from 398 (about 347–407), called “golden-mouthed” for his eloquence. The Catholic Encyclopedia calls him the chief representative of Antioch’s grammatical-historical interpretation, which opposed Origen’s allegorical reading.From: Baur; Baur; Baur; BaurAll terms → and Wesley read the image as impossibility; Clement, Chrysostom and CalvinJohn CalvinA Protestant reformer (1509–1564) who settled in Geneva in 1536, with an interval away, according to the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica. Alongside the Institutes of the Christian Religion, he wrote commentaries on Scripture.From: Alexander; Alexander; Alexander; Alexander; AlexanderAll terms → deny that wealth itself is condemned while keeping the warning. The gate explanation is first traced, by Ziemińska, to a medieval gloss; no ancient evidence for such a gate is known to her.

The three Gospels give the camel-and-needle comparison, the hearers' question about salvation and Jesus' reply about God. Ziemińska found no ancient evidence of a needle gate; the earliest mention she identifies is a medieval gloss. The compared Greek editions print camel; rope is a documented interpretation.

At a glance

What the texts say

Matthew 19:21 Matthew 19:23–24 Matthew 19:25–26 Mark 10:23–27 Luke 18:24–27

  • Early church: Greek. Clement insists that Jesus' words about the rich must not be heard carnally but searched for their hidden meaning.
  • Catholic. The Catechism teaches that the precept of detachment from riches is obligatory for entrance into the Kingdom of heaven.

What history can tell us

Claims about the text

Claims others made

Theological claims

Hard questions

One common misunderstanding: Ziemińska found no ancient evidence of such a gate.

Who, where, when
Who
Jesus
Where
Jerusalem
How to read this page
Text what the text saysTradition later interpretationEvidence what has been foundScholarship inference; scholars differ1 numbered source

Read with these questions

What evidence would tell an ancient gate name apart from a later name inspired by the saying?7 10

What the texts say

Show 2 more key verses

Background

The encounter behind the saying Text

A man asks Jesus about eternal life. The familiar label 'rich young ruler' combines Matthew's description of him as young with Luke's description of him as a ruler; Mark alone says he ran up and knelt. All three describe his wealth. The camel saying follows the encounter, and Jesus widens the warning to rich people.8 sources8 sources11. Matthew 19:1612. Mark 10:1713. Luke 18:1825. Matthew 19:2026. Matthew 19:2217. Matthew 19:2318. Mark 10:2319. Luke 18:24

The gate story's traceable history Scholarship

Agnieszka Ziemińska (2022) finds no ancient evidence of the phrase as the name of a Jerusalem gate. The earliest mention she identifies seems to be a gloss attributed to Anselm (eleventh century), preserved in AquinasThomas AquinasA philosopher, theologian and Doctor of the Church, born in 1225 or 1227 and deceased in 1274, according to the 1912 Catholic Encyclopedia. He wrote the Summa theologica.From: Kennedy; KennedyAll terms →'s thirteenth-century Catena aurea; if the attribution is right, the source is eleventh or twelfth century. She also reports Hugh of Saint-Cher's thirteenth-century gate called 'the needle', and, following Gnilka, the fifteenth-century pilgrim Johannes Poloner's small door locally called the eye of a needle. The small-gate theory, she says, gained popularity in the nineteenth century.5 sources5 sources7. Ziemińska 20228. Ziemińska 202227. Ziemińska 202210. Broadus 188628. Ziemińska 2022

Later names, and what they can show Evidence

Lord Nugent's travel book (1846) reports camel drivers at a double gateway in Hebron calling its small side arch 'the hole or eye of the needle'. James Patch (International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia, 1915) says no such use of the word exists in Bible lands; the two reports conflict. Candida Moss (2022) reports that the Russian Orthodox Church of St Alexander Nevsky in Jerusalem identifies an opening in a wall as the 'eye of the needle'. Broadus judges that such names probably arose from the saying itself and from JeromeJeromeA Latin Church Father associated with the Vulgate, born in the fourth century and deceased in 420. Birth dates differ: Louis Saltet gives about 340–342, while Dionisio Candido gives 347.From: Saltet; CandidoAll terms →'s allegory.4 sources4 sources29. Nugent-Grenville) 184630. Patch 191531. Moss 202210. Broadus 1886

Show 3 more background topics (The Talmud's elephant and the needle; Camel or rope in the Qur'an; What the prosperity reports can and cannot show)

The Talmud's elephant and the needle Tradition

In Berakhot 55b, Rava illustrates the teaching that dreams reflect waking thoughts: no one is shown a golden palm tree or an elephant passing through a needle's eye. In Bava Metzia 38b, Rav Sheshet mocks a colleague by asking whether he comes from Pumbedita, where people pass an elephant through the eye of a needle; the modern Koren-Steinsaltz translation explains the jibe as specious reasoning, a gloss not in the TalmudTalmudA collection of rabbinic teachings and discussions framed as commentary on the Mishnah. Sara Ronis explains that the name usually means the Babylonian Talmud, produced from the third to seventh centuries CE.From: Ronis; RonisAll terms →'s own words. Broadus and Plummer read these as idioms of impossibility.4 sources4 sources32. edition33. edition34. edition10. Broadus 1886

Camel or rope in the Qur'an Tradition

Qur'an 7:40 says that those who arrogantly deny God's signs will not enter Paradise until a camel passes through the eye of a needle, a way of saying never. Ibn KathirIbn KathirAn Arab historian and scholar who taught at Damascus (1301–1373), according to the first Encyclopaedia of Islam. He wrote a universal history and a commentary on the Qur’an.From: Islam; Islam; IslamAll terms → takes the Arabic jamal as a male camel but reports that Ibn Abbas recited it as jummal, a thick rope; Abdel Haleem's modern translation follows the rope sense. The same camel-or-rope question thus arises in Islamic exegesis, on an Arabic word. Plummer and Broadus suppose the Qur'an borrowed the image from the Gospels; that is their hypothesis.35 36

What the prosperity reports can and cannot show Scholarship

Jason Colavito quotes Joel Osteen, from a 2012 Newsweek sidebar, saying that God wants to increase people financially, and argues that this contradicts the camel saying. The Osteen line reaches us only through Colavito and is not about this verse. Cameron Buettel says the gate theory is predominant among many prosperity preachers and televangelists, but names none. No prosperity teacher's own exposition of this passage was found.37 23

Where else Scripture speaks of it

Text
  • Matthew 23:24 Jesus uses the camel in another exaggerated image, aimed at blind guides: the gnat strained out, the camel swallowed. Broadus compares this verse to show that the camel saying is hyperbole of the same kind; the ISBE article 'Needle' (1915) makes the same comparison.

    24You blind guides! You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.

    Read in context →

  • Isaiah 60:6 Jerome uses Isaiah's camels of Midian and Ephah coming to Jerusalem in his allegory of laying aside sin. Broadus suspects this helped give rise to the later gate gloss; that connection is his hypothesis.

    6Caravans of camels will cover your land, young camels of Midian and Ephah, and all from Sheba will come, bearing gold and frankincense and proclaiming the praises of the LORD.

    Read in context →

How the traditions read it

Tradition

How different traditions read these texts, in their own terms.

Early church: Greek · Clement of Alexandria — wealth as an instrument

Clement insists that Jesus' words about the rich must not be heard carnally but searched for their hidden meaning. He reads the command to sell as spoken of the passions of the soul, and calls wealth an instrument, blameless in itself and good or bad by its use; riches that benefit one's neighbours are not to be thrown away. A rich man ruled by his wealth, he says, will sooner see the camel pass. Łukasz Koszałka (2026) argues that Clement shifts the focus from external possession to inner disposition.38 39 40

Early church: Greek · John Chrysostom — the highest degree of impossibility

In his Homily 63 on Matthew, Chrysostom says Jesus blames not riches but those held in subjection by them, and the covetous even more. Yet he reads the move from 'hard' to the camel as showing that entry is impossible in the highest degree, and takes Jesus' reply as showing that great grace is needed.41 4

Early church: Latin · Jerome — hard, not impossible, and the camels of Midian

In Aquinas's excerpts, Jerome opens with the plain sense: no rich man can be saved. Of the earlier 'hard' saying he notes that Jesus says hard, not impossible, which points to rarity. He then compares the rich to the camels of Midian and Ephah in Isaiah 60, which may enter the narrow way once they lay aside the load of sins. This is an allegory, not a report of a gate.42 43

Show 9 more interpretations (Early church: Greek, Catholic, Orthodox…)

Early church: Greek · Cyril of Alexandria — a sailor's cable

In his homilies on Luke, Cyril says that by camel Jesus means not the animal but a thick cable, because sailors call their thicker cables camels. Read here in an 1859 translation of the Syriac version, he is a fifth-century witness to the reading but not necessarily its first: Broadus also mentions a scholium ascribed to OrigenOrigenA Christian scholar and teacher of Alexandria, born in 185 and deceased probably in 253 or 254, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia. Marco Rizzi explains that he interpreted the Septuagint allegorically, like Philo.From: Prat; Prat; Prat; Rizzi; PratAll terms →.44 10

Catholic · The Catechism — detachment required of all

The Catechism teaches that the precept of detachment from riches is obligatory for entrance into the Kingdom of heaven. It says that in all three Synoptic Gospels the call to the rich young man is joined to the call to poverty and chastity, and that the evangelicalEvangelicalThe National Association of Evangelicals describes evangelicals as people who take the Bible seriously and believe in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord; it derives the name from Greek euangelion, “good news” or “gospel”.From: EvangelicalsAll terms → counsels are inseparable from the commandments. That joining is its doctrinal synthesis; the encounters themselves command selling, giving and following.5 sources5 sources45. Church 199746. Church 199714. Matthew 19:2115. Mark 10:2116. Luke 18:22

Orthodox · Theophylact, Metropolitan Hilarion and Fr Seraphim Holland

Theophylact's eleventh-century commentary, as Ziemińska translates it, reports that some say the camel is the thick cable sailors use to cast anchors; it mentions no gate. Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeyev), in a 2015 homily, says the saying condemns neither riches nor money but what can result from the pursuit of wealth, and that the Kingdom is given to those who share. Fr Seraphim Holland says the Church has never regarded wealth as inherently evil, but the holding on to it.27 47 48

Protestant: Reformed · Calvin and Piper — rope, danger and effectual grace

Calvin thought camel denotes a sailor's rope, yet still read the saying as amplifying the rich person's difficulty. Riches, he says, do not in their own nature hinder anyone from following God, but through human depravity it is scarcely possible for the very rich to avoid being intoxicated by them. John Piper (2000) says there is no such gate and the context will not allow it, and reads Jesus' reply as God effectually enabling people to leave their riches and follow Christ.49 50 51

Protestant: Methodist · John Wesley — humanly impossible

Wesley's Notes call the saying a proverbial expression meaning that, humanly speaking, it is an absolute impossibility. He denies that Mark's words about trusting in riches retract it, since it is as hard for those who have riches not to trust in them. His sermon 'The Use of Money' gives three rules: gain all you can, save all you can, give all you can; gaining must not harm one's neighbour, and gaining and saving are nothing without giving.52 53 54

Protestant: evangelical · Cameron Buettel — the context requires impossibility

Buettel argues that getting a camel to stoop through a small gate would not need divine intervention, so the gate reading cannot fit Jesus' reply that salvation is impossible for man but possible for God. He quotes John MacArthur's commentary that there is no evidence such a gate ever existed; the commentary itself was not read here.23 55

Jehovah's Witnesses · Insight on the Scriptures — a literal needle

Insight on the Scriptures notes that some have held the needle's eye to be a small gate, but argues from the Greek words that a literal needle is meant. It also reports that George Lamsa's translation puts rope, with a footnote saying the AramaicAramaicA Semitic language closely related to Hebrew. The HarperCollins Bible Dictionary notes that parts of Ezra, Daniel and Jeremiah and a phrase in Genesis are written in Aramaic; Jesus probably spoke a Western Aramaic dialect.From: Daniel 2:4; Powell; Perrin; PowellAll terms → gamla means rope and camel; Lamsa is known here only through that report.56 57

Academic (critical) · Agnieszka Ziemińska — the radical image

Ziemińska concludes that the gate procedure tried to suggest that the rich could get through with difficulty, and that Jesus' statement is radical and should remain so. Separately, she describes the huge animal and tiny opening as a saying used in Semitic circles for impossibility, and suggests it was therefore most likely put into Jesus' mouth; that is a judgment about origins, not a finding of her study of the gate.58

Skeptic/secular · Jason Colavito — a story for the rich

Skeptic writer Jason Colavito calls the gate story a medieval fabrication invented to justify sending the rich to heaven. The medieval date fits Ziemińska's findings; the motive is his inference. The earliest gloss reads the gate morally, requiring the rich to put off the burden of sin and riches.37 59 8

Common misunderstandings

Text

Things people commonly believe the text says, checked against it.

  • A common belief among believers

    Myth The needle's eye gate is an established fact about Jerusalem in Jesus' time.

    Actually Ziemińska found no ancient evidence of such a gate. The earliest mention she identifies is a medieval gloss, and the nineteenth-century name Nugent reports belongs to a gate at Hebron.4 sources4 sources7. Ziemińska 202227. Ziemińska 202210. Broadus 188629. Nugent-Grenville) 1846

  • A common belief among believers

    Myth The gate story goes back to Theophylact's commentary.

    Actually Ziemińska finds no gate in Theophylact's comment on Matthew 19:24; he reports that some take the camel as a sailor's cable. She names Fee and Stuart among writers who repeat the attribution, and identifies the gloss attributed to Anselm as the earliest apparent gate reference.27 8

  • A common belief among believers

    Myth In Mark, Jesus says only that it is hard for those who trust in riches.

    Actually Five of the eight Greek editions STEPBible compares, including NA28 and SBLGNT, lack the words about trusting in riches; Bruce calls them a scribal toning down, though the Sinaitic Syriac has them. Wesley denies that Mark 10:24 retracts the hard saying, since it is as hard for those who have riches not to trust in them.4 sources4 sources60. this site's data61. this site's data62. Bruce 189753. Wesley

Show 3 more misconceptions

  • A common belief among skeptics

    Myth Reading 'camel' as a rope is always a way of softening the saying.

    Actually Plummer calls the cable reading (κάμιλον), found only in a few late manuscripts, an attempt to tone down a strong statement; Broadus calls the cable reading only an attempt to soften the incongruity of the image. But Lorah argues that a heavy ship's hawser makes the image stronger, not less impossible, and Calvin, who read rope, still read the saying as amplifying the difficulty for the rich.4 sources4 sources63. Plummer 191410. Broadus 188664. Jr. 199649. Pringle 1845

  • A common belief among skeptics

    Myth Early Christians who distinguished wealth from its use removed the saying's severity.

    Actually Chrysostom says Jesus blames not riches but those held in subjection by them, yet reads the camel comparison as impossibility in the highest degree. Clement calls wealth an instrument good or bad by its use, but says a rich man ruled by his wealth will sooner see the camel pass.41 39

  • A common belief among skeptics

    Myth The gate story is known to have been invented to let the rich into heaven.

    Actually That motive is Jason Colavito's inference. The earliest gloss applies the gate morally: the rich must put off the burden of sin and riches. Ziemińska, for her part, concludes that the gate procedure suggested the rich could get through with difficulty.37 59 58

Words worth a closer look

Text

Where the wording in different Bibles diverges, and why.

Mark 10:25 · Luke 18:25 · “Camel or cable” κάμηλον / κάμιλον

The animal word, κάμηλον, is printed at all three verses in each of the eight editions STEPBible compares, from NA28 to the Textus Receptus; none prints κάμιλον, the rope word. Alfred Plummer reports the rope reading in Matthew and Luke only in a few late manuscripts and calls it an attempt to tone down a strong statement. Cyril of Alexandria and Calvin keep the printed word but take it to mean a sailor's cable.4 sources4 sources9. this site's data63. Plummer 191444. Smith) 185949. Pringle 1845

Open in compare →

Mark 10:25 · Luke 18:25 · “The needle and its eye” τρυπήματος ῥαφίδος / τρυμαλιᾶς ῥαφίδος / τρήματος βελόνης

In NA28 and SBLGNT, Matthew, Mark and Luke each use a different word for the eye; Matthew and Mark share ῥαφίς for the needle, while Luke has βελόνη. Other editions vary. A. B. Bruce takes the variation as pointing to different Greek renderings of a saying originally given in a Semitic language; that is his inference.5 sources5 sources65. this site's data20. Matthew 19:2421. Mark 10:2522. Luke 18:2566. Bruce 1897

Open in compare →

Mark 10:24 · “Trusting in riches”

Of the eight Greek editions STEPBible compares, only Tregelles, the Textus Receptus and the Byzantine text print the words about those who trust in riches; NA28, NA27, Tyndale House, SBLGNT and Westcott-Hort omit them. Of nine English editions in the database, only the Berean Standard Bible leaves them out, giving them in a footnote. Bruce calls the words a toning down more worthy of a scribe than of Jesus, though he notes the Sinaitic Syriac has them. Wesley denies that the words retract the hard saying, since it is as hard for those who have riches not to trust in them.6 sources6 sources60. this site's data61. this site's data67. this site's data68. this site's data62. Bruce 189753. Wesley

Open in compare →

History and evidence

Evidence

Each claim judged on its own, with the limits of the evidence stated.

  • No outside evidence · silence partly expected

    A Jerusalem gate called the needle's eye existed in Jesus' time

    Ziemińska finds no ancient evidence of the phrase as the name of a Jerusalem gate in Jesus' time or earlier; the earliest mention she identifies seems to be the medieval gloss attributed to Anselm, and she allows a lost earlier source.

    Why this verdict

    Claims others made

    Confidence: high

    Ziemińska finds no ancient evidence of the phrase as the name of a Jerusalem gate in Jesus' time or earlier; the earliest mention she identifies seems to be the medieval gloss attributed to Anselm, and she allows a lost earlier source. JosephusJosephusA Jewish historian (37–after 100 CE), according to Steve Mason and the Jewish Encyclopedia. Mason explains that his Antiquities, completed in 93/94 CE, retells Judean history from creation to the eve of the war against Rome.From: Mason; Mason; Gottheil; Mason; MasonAll terms → names some Jerusalem gates without this one, but does not list every small entrance, so his silence is only partly informative. Absence in the sources checked does not prove that no such gate ever existed.4 sources4 sources7. Ziemińska 202227. Ziemińska 202210. Broadus 188669. Whiston

    Cross-community agreement · Writers from different communities find no support for an ancient gate: Ziemińska (critical), Broadus (a Baptist commentator, 1886), Piper (Reformed), MacArthur as Buettel quotes him (evangelical) and Insight on the Scriptures (Jehovah's Witnesses). Ziemińska writes that most biblical scholars now think the theory incorrect; that is her characterisation, not a survey. (as of 2026-11-09)

    What would change this verdict: An independently dated ancient source naming a Jerusalem gate the needle's eye.

  • Supported

    The Greek text of the saying has camel (κάμηλον), not the rope word (κάμιλον)

    All eight Greek editions STEPBible compares print camel at the three verses.

    Why this verdict

    Claims about the text

    Confidence: high

    All eight Greek editions STEPBible compares print camel at the three verses. Plummer reports the rope reading only in a few late manuscripts of Matthew and Luke, and Broadus reports camel in the Coptic, Latin and PeshittaPeshittaAn ancient Syriac version of the Old and New Testaments used in Syriac churches. The Jewish Encyclopedia explains its name as “the simple one”.From: HirschAll terms → versions; no manuscripts were collated here. The rope case rests not on the printed Greek but on how the word was understood (Cyril, Calvin) or on the Aramaic behind it (Bain, as Lorah quotes him).7 sources7 sources9. this site's data63. Plummer 191457. Bible10. Broadus 188644. Smith) 185949. Pringle 184570. Jr. 1996

    Cross-community agreement · Plummer calls the rope reading, found in a few late manuscripts, a toning down; Broadus calls the cable reading an attempt to soften the image, and Metzger, as Lorah quotes him, an attempt to soften the rigour of the statement. Calvin's 1845 editor wrote that critics had very generally abandoned the cable idea. Cyril reads the word as a thick cable and Calvin as a sailor's rope; Lorah quotes Bain that the Aramaic word gmla can mean rope or camel. (as of 2026-11-09)

    What would change this verdict: Early manuscripts or versions, collated directly, reading the rope word.

  • Open

    The camel saying adapts a proverb already current in Jesus' day

    The Talmud's elephant sayings show the same kind of impossibility image, but they are later texts.

    Why this verdict

    Claims about the text

    Confidence: medium

    The Talmud's elephant sayings show the same kind of impossibility image, but they are later texts. Broadus allows that Jesus may have used a proverb, yet finds no proof one was current then. Ziemińska suggests a Semitic impossibility saying was most likely put into Jesus' mouth; Bruce takes the differing Greek words as renderings of a Semitic original. These are distinct proposals, and none dates the saying.5 sources5 sources32. edition33. edition10. Broadus 188658. Ziemińska 202266. Bruce 1897

    Contested · Ziemińska (critical) proposes attribution of a Semitic saying to Jesus; Broadus (a Baptist commentator) allows a proverb but finds no proof of its currency; Bruce argues for a Semitic original wording without deciding who coined it. (as of 2026-11-09)

    What would change this verdict: A dated source showing the proverb in circulation before or during Jesus' lifetime.

  • Outside what evidence can settle

    God makes possible the salvation of the rich that people cannot achieve

    This is the theological content of Jesus' reply.

    Why this verdict

    Theological claims

    Confidence: high

    This is the theological content of Jesus' reply. Chrysostom connects it with great grace and the rich person's renunciation; Piper reads it as God's effectual enabling; Wesley calls the saying, humanly speaking, an absolute impossibility. How salvation becomes possible is a question of theology, not of historical evidence.4 sources4 sources4. Matthew 19:2641. 151. Piper 200052. Wesley

    Contested · Chrysostom joins grace and renunciation; Piper argues for effectual grace rather than a grace that only makes faith possible for all. (as of 2026-11-09)

Hard questions

The strongest case, the strongest responses, then a plain assessment of where the logic holds.

Was there a gate called the needle's eye, and where does the idea come from?

The gate explanation is documented from a medieval gloss onward, but no ancient evidence for such a gate in Jesus' time was found in the sources checked.

See the argument

The strongest case

The gate reading has a long pedigree. A gloss in Aquinas's Catena aurea, attributed to Anselm, says that at Jerusalem there was a gate called the needle's eye, through which a camel could pass only on its knees after its burden was taken off, and it draws the moral that the rich must put off the burden of sin and riches. Hugh of Saint-Cher, in the thirteenth century, wrote of a gate in Jerusalem called the needle, and the fifteenth-century pilgrim Johannes Poloner described a small door locally called the eye of a needle, both as Ziemińska reports. In 1846 Lord Nugent reported camel drivers at Hebron calling a small side arch the eye of the needle, and in 2022 Candida Moss reported a Jerusalem church identifying an opening as the eye of the needle.8 sources8 sources59. (ed.) 184128. Ziemińska 20227. Ziemińska 202229. Nugent-Grenville) 184631. Moss 20228. Ziemińska 202210. Broadus 188669. Whiston

  1. P1. The three Gospels compare a camel passing through a needle's eye with a rich person entering God's kingdom.20 21 22No listed response challenges this premise
  2. P2. Medieval writers from the gloss onward place a gate called the needle's eye in Jerusalem, and later travellers report the name in local use.4 sources4 sources59. (ed.) 184128. Ziemińska 20227. Ziemińska 202229. Nugent-Grenville) 1846No listed response challenges this premise
  3. P3. So Jesus was referring to a real gate, which a camel can pass by kneeling and being unloaded.

→ Conclusion. The saying pictures a hard but possible passage; the rich can enter by laying down their burden.

Strongest responses

Academic (critical) challenges P3

No ancient trace of the name. Ziemińska finds no ancient evidence of the phrase as the name of a Jerusalem gate in Jesus' time or earlier. The earliest mention she identifies seems to be the gloss attributed to Anselm; if the attribution is right, it points to an eleventh- or twelfth-century source, though she allows a lost earlier one. Josephus names Jerusalem gates without this one, but his description does not list every small entrance.5 sources5 sources7. Ziemińska 20228. Ziemińska 202227. Ziemińska 202210. Broadus 188669. Whiston

Tradition unspecified challenges P3

The names may come from the saying. Broadus judges that, so far as such gate names really existed, they probably arose from the saying itself, in the New Testament, the Talmud and the Koran, together with Jerome's allegory; he calls the gloss 'to all appearance' a conjecture suggested by Jerome's remark about camels entering Jerusalem. The direction of influence may run from saying to name. Patch (1915) adds that no such use of the word exists in Bible lands, which conflicts with Nugent's report.10 30 29

Protestant: evangelical challenges the conclusion

A stooping camel needs no miracle. Buettel argues that getting a camel to stoop through a small gate would not need divine intervention, so the gate reading cannot fit Jesus' reply that salvation is impossible for man but possible for God. Piper says the context will not allow the gate interpretation.5 sources5 sources23. Buettel 201551. Piper 20004. Matthew 19:265. Mark 10:276. Luke 18:27

Plain assessment

The gloss and Hugh of Saint-Cher document a medieval explanation, Poloner a fifteenth-century local name and Nugent a nineteenth-century name at Hebron. None of them is ancient, and Ziemińska found no ancient evidence for a gate of that name. Broadus's proposal that the names, and the gloss itself, grew from the saying and Jerome's allegory explains the later reports, but it remains his inference. The silence of Josephus is weak evidence either way.

What would change this assessment: A dated source from Jesus' time or earlier naming such a gate.

Assessment uses: The gate story's traceable history · Later names, and what they can show · Early church: Latin · A Jerusalem gate called the needle's eye existed in Jesus' time · Protestant: evangelical

Does 'camel' really mean a rope or ship's cable?

The compared Greek editions print camel and the rope reading is reported only in late manuscripts; rope is an old interpretation whose Aramaic argument was not checked here.

See the argument

The strongest case

Cyril of Alexandria says Jesus means not the animal but a thick cable, because sailors call their thicker cables camels; Theophylact, as Ziemińska translates him, reports that some say the same, and Broadus mentions a scholium ascribed to Origen. Calvin thought camel denotes a sailor's rope. Theodore Lorah quotes Alan Bain that the Peshitta's Aramaic word gmla can mean rope or camel and that Aramaic-speaking churches have received rope here; Insight on the Scriptures reports that Lamsa's translation puts rope. In Islamic tradition, Ibn Kathir reports that Ibn Abbas recited the word in Qur'an 7:40 as jummal, a thick rope.11 sources11 sources44. Smith) 185927. Ziemińska 202210. Broadus 18869. this site's data63. Plummer 191471. Jr. 199649. Pringle 184570. Jr. 199657. Bible36. translation72. translation

  1. P1. Cyril and Calvin read the camel as a sailor's cable, and Theophylact reports that some did.44 49 27No listed response challenges this premise
  2. P2. According to Bain, as Lorah quotes him, the Aramaic word gmla can mean rope or camel.70 57
  3. P3. So the saying originally pictured a thick rope, and camel is a misreading of it.

→ Conclusion. Jesus compared the rich person's entry to a rope, not an animal, passing through a needle's eye.

Strongest responses

Tradition unspecified challenges P3

The Greek text reads camel. All eight Greek editions STEPBible compares print camel at the three verses. Plummer reports the rope reading only in a few late manuscripts of Matthew and Luke and calls it an attempt to tone down a strong statement; Metzger, as Lorah quotes him, calls it an attempt to soften the rigour of the statement. Calvin's 1845 English editor noted that critics, who had once leaned strongly to the cable idea, had by then very generally abandoned it.4 sources4 sources9. this site's data63. Plummer 191471. Jr. 199673. note) 1845

Tradition unspecified challenges P2

The ancient versions give camel. Broadus reports camel in the Coptic, Latin and Peshitta versions, which bears on Bain's claim about the Peshitta's word. He calls the cable reading, in Cyril, a scholium ascribed to Origen and the 'some' reported by Theophylact and Euthymius, only an attempt to soften the incongruity of the image. Bain's lexical claim was not checked here against Syriac sources.10 70

Plain assessment

Camel is what the compared Greek editions print, and Plummer and Broadus treat the rope reading as late or secondary. The rope case rests on how interpreters understood the word (Cyril, Calvin, those Theophylact reports) and on Bain's claim about the Aramaic, which Lorah quotes and which sits uneasily with Broadus's report that the Peshitta gives camel; neither the Aramaic word nor the manuscripts were checked directly here. Ibn Abbas's jummal raises the same question about an Arabic word, not about the Gospel text.

What would change this assessment: A direct collation of early manuscripts and versions, and checked Aramaic lexical evidence for gmla.

Assessment uses: Camel or cable · The Greek text of the saying has camel (κάμηλον), not the rope word (κάμιλον) · Early church: Greek · Protestant: Reformed · Orthodox · Camel or rope in the Qur'an

Do the Talmud's elephant sayings show where the image came from?

The parallels illustrate an idiom of impossibility, but they do not date a proverb to Jesus' day or show whether he coined it, used it or was credited with it.

See the argument

The strongest case

The Babylonian Talmud twice has an elephant passing through a needle's eye, once about dreams and once in a jibe at Pumbedita's reasoning; Plummer cites a camel dancing in a small corn measure; Bruce reports Furrer's claim that camel-and-needle proverbs for the impossible were still current among Arabs. Ziemińska, a critical scholar, describes the image of a huge pack animal passing through a tiny opening as a saying used in Semitic circles for impossibility, and suggests that it was therefore most likely put into Jesus' mouth.6 sources6 sources32. edition33. edition10. Broadus 188666. Bruce 189758. Ziemińska 202235. translation

  1. P1. Berakhot 55b and Bava Metzia 38b use an elephant passing through a needle's eye, in different discussions.32 33No listed response challenges this premise
  2. P2. Ziemińska describes the huge animal and tiny opening as a saying used in Semitic circles for impossibility.58No listed response challenges this premise
  3. P3. She infers that the saying was therefore most likely put into Jesus' mouth.58

→ Conclusion. On Ziemińska's account, the comparison came from common Semitic idiom and was attributed to Jesus.

Strongest responses

Tradition unspecified challenges P3

Using a proverb is not inventing one, and none is dated. Broadus accepts the Talmud's elephant as an expression of impossibility and allows that Jesus may have been using a proverb, but holds that there is no proof such a saying was current in his time. He and Plummer read the parallels as showing an idiom of impossibility, not as dating a proverb to Jesus' day.10

Tradition unspecified challenges the framing

Semitic wording is a separate question. Bruce argues that the Gospels' different Greek words for the needle and its eye point to separate renderings of a saying originally given in a Semitic language. He also reports Furrer's claim that camel-and-needle proverbs for the impossible were still current among Arabs.66 65

Plain assessment

Broadus and Plummer read the parallels as idioms of impossibility. In context, Berakhot uses the elephant for an image outside a dreamer's waking thoughts, Bava Metzia to mock an argument, and the Qur'an for those who will never enter Paradise. The rabbinic parallels are later, and Broadus finds no proof that a proverb was current in Jesus' day. Ziemińska's suggestion that the saying was put into Jesus' mouth and Bruce's case for a Semitic original are proposals about origin, not results of the parallels.

What would change this assessment: Dated evidence for the proverb's circulation before or during Jesus' lifetime.

Assessment uses: The Talmud's elephant and the needle · Camel or rope in the Qur'an · The camel saying adapts a proverb already current in Jesus' day · The needle and its eye

Does the saying condemn wealth itself?

The cited traditions condemn bondage to wealth rather than wealth itself while keeping the warning; whether that softens the command to sell is a judgment evidence cannot settle.

See the argument

The strongest case

Taken at its word, the passage is hard on wealth: Jesus tells the man to sell his possessions and give to the poor, then says the camel will pass through the needle's eye more easily than a rich person enters the kingdom. Ziemińska concludes that the statement is radical and should remain so. Skeptic writer Jason Colavito calls the gate story a medieval fabrication invented to justify sending the rich to heaven, and sets the saying against a line he quotes from Joel Osteen about God wanting to increase people financially.16 sources16 sources14. Matthew 19:2115. Mark 10:2116. Luke 18:2217. Matthew 19:2318. Mark 10:2319. Luke 18:2458. Ziemińska 202237. Colavito 201259. (ed.) 184139. Wilson41. 150. Pringle 184545. Church 199754. Wesley47. (Alfeyev) 201523. Buettel 2015

  1. P1. Jesus commands the man to sell his possessions and give to the poor, then warns about rich people entering the kingdom.9 sources9 sources14. Matthew 19:2115. Mark 10:2116. Luke 18:2217. Matthew 19:2318. Mark 10:2319. Luke 18:2420. Matthew 19:2421. Mark 10:2522. Luke 18:25No listed response challenges this premise
  2. P2. Colavito argues that the gate story was invented to justify the rich and that a promise of financial increase contradicts the saying.37No listed response challenges this premise
  3. P3. So readings that let the rich keep their wealth accommodate what the saying rules out.

→ Conclusion. The saying condemns wealth itself, not only its misuse.

Strongest responses

Early church: Greek challenges P3

Ruled by riches, not owning them. Clement calls wealth an instrument, blameless in itself and good or bad by its use, and reads the command to sell as spoken of the passions; yet a rich man ruled by his wealth, he says, will sooner see the camel pass. Chrysostom says Jesus blames not riches but those held in subjection by them, while reading the camel as impossibility in the highest degree.39 41

Catholic challenges P3

Detachment is required of everyone. The Catechism teaches that the precept of detachment from riches is obligatory for entrance into the Kingdom of heaven. It requires detachment of every believer rather than condemning possession as such, and adds that the Lord grieves over the rich who find consolation in abundance.45

Orthodox challenges the conclusion

What the pursuit of wealth produces. Metropolitan Hilarion says the saying condemns neither riches nor money themselves, but what can result from the pursuit of wealth, and that the Kingdom is given to those who share. Fr Seraphim Holland says the Church has never regarded wealth as inherently evil, but the holding on to it.47 48

Protestant: Reformed challenges the framing

The danger lies in human depravity. Calvin writes that riches do not in their own nature hinder anyone from following God, but that through human depravity it is scarcely possible for the very rich to avoid being intoxicated by them. On his reading wealth itself is not condemned, but the danger is near universal.50

Protestant: Methodist challenges P3

Gain and save in order to give. Wesley's rules are to gain all you can, save all you can and give all you can; gaining must not harm one's neighbour, and gaining and saving are nothing without giving. He also denies that Mark's words about trusting in riches soften the warning, since it is as hard for those who have riches not to trust in them.54 53

Plain assessment

None of the cited Christian readings condemns possession as such, and none drops the warning. Clement and Chrysostom place the danger in being ruled by riches, Calvin in human depravity; the CatechismCatechism of the Catholic ChurchAn official summary of Catholic teaching that John Paul II ordered published in 1992, declaring it a sure norm for teaching the faith. He approved and promulgated its Latin typical edition in 1997.From: II; II; II; II; IIAll terms → requires detachment of everyone, Wesley ties gaining and saving to giving, and Hilarion links the Kingdom to sharing. Whether those distinctions honour or soften the command to sell is the point in dispute. Colavito's motive for the gate story is his inference, and the earliest gloss asks the rich to lay down sin and riches. No prosperity teacher's own exposition of the passage was found; Osteen's line reaches us through Colavito.

What would change this assessment: A prosperity teacher's own sustained exposition of this passage, or a tradition reading it as condemning possession itself.

Assessment uses: Matt.19.21 · Early church: Greek · Early church: Greek · Protestant: Reformed · Catholic · Protestant: Methodist · Orthodox · Skeptic/secular · What the prosperity reports can and cannot show

Do the gate and rope explanations soften the saying?

The gate reading turns impossibility into difficulty, as its critics argue and no cited source answers; the rope reading need not, since Lorah and Calvin keep the saying severe.

See the argument

The strongest case

A. B. Bruce says the figure is to be taken as it stands, not 'civilised' by making the camel a cable or the needle's eye the wicket of an Oriental house. Swete says attempts to soften the proverb, by a ship's cable, a narrow wady or a gate a camel can scarcely pass, miss the point of a simile meant to put the impossibility in the strongest light. Broadus finds it perfectly evident that Jesus was understood as stating an impossibility. Mark Woods notes that the gate picture implies a rich person who was not very rich, or gave a lot away, would be all right.12 sources12 sources74. Bruce 189775. Swete 189810. Broadus 188676. Woods 201558. Ziemińska 202223. Buettel 201564. Jr. 199649. Pringle 184550. Pringle 18454. Matthew 19:2641. 151. Piper 2000

  1. P1. The hearers ask who then can be saved, and Jesus replies that it is impossible for people but not for God.6 sources6 sources1. Matthew 19:252. Mark 10:263. Luke 18:264. Matthew 19:265. Mark 10:276. Luke 18:27No listed response challenges this premise
  2. P2. Reading the camel as a cable, or the needle as a gate, makes the image less than impossible.74 75
  3. P3. An image of something hard but possible cannot explain why the hearers ask who can be saved and Jesus appeals to God.10 23No listed response challenges this premise

→ Conclusion. Both the gate and the rope soften the saying, which should be read as an impossibility.

Strongest responses

Tradition unspecified challenges P2

A cable can make the image stronger. Lorah argues that a heavy ship's hawser through a needle would make the image stronger, not at all less impossible or less hyperbolic. A rope reading can therefore keep the force that Bruce and Swete want protected.64 74 75

Protestant: Reformed challenges P2

Rope, with the warning intact. Calvin thought camel denotes a sailor's rope, yet still read the saying as amplifying the difficulty for the rich, and wrote that it is scarcely possible for the very rich to avoid being intoxicated by riches. Choosing rope did not soften his point.49 50

Plain assessment

The two explanations need separate verdicts. Against the gate, Ziemińska argues that it turns impossibility into difficulty and Buettel that a stooping camel needs no divine help; no source gathered here answers them on the gate's behalf. For the rope, the charge does not hold in general: Lorah argues a hawser makes the image stronger, and Calvin read rope while keeping the warning severe. Jesus' reply about God's power is theological; Chrysostom reads it as great grace, Piper as effectual enabling.

What would change this assessment: A defender of the gate reading who explains how a passable gate fits both the hearers' alarm and Jesus' appeal to God.

Assessment uses: Academic (critical) · Protestant: evangelical · Protestant: Reformed · Early church: Greek · The Greek text of the saying has camel (κάμηλον), not the rope word (κάμιλον) · God makes possible the salvation of the rich that people cannot achieve · Camel or cable

Check yourself

What follows the camel comparison in all three accounts?

The hearers ask who then can be saved, and Jesus contrasts what is impossible for people with what God can do.6 sources6 sources1. Matthew 19:252. Mark 10:263. Luke 18:264. Matthew 19:265. Mark 10:276. Luke 18:27

Matthew 19:25–26 Mark 10:26–27 Luke 18:26–27

What is the earliest gate mention Ziemińska identifies?

A gloss attributed to Anselm of Canterbury, preserved in Aquinas's thirteenth-century Catena aurea; its earlier date depends on the attribution.8 27 10

What do the two Talmud elephant passages discuss?

Berakhot 55b discusses dreams and waking thoughts; Bava Metzia 38b uses the image to mock an argument.32 33

For reflection

How would distinguishing possessions from being ruled by them change your reading of the command to sell and give?5 sources5 sources14. Matthew 19:2115. Mark 10:2116. Luke 18:2239. Wilson41. 1

Keep going

Cite this page

Plain citation

Is the 'eye of the needle' a gate in Jerusalem? Know the Text. Seek lens, version 1, revised 2026-11-09, Fact-checked. https://knowthetext.com/seek/questions/matthew-19-24/

Chicago-style note

Know the Text, “Is the 'eye of the needle' a gate in Jerusalem?” Seek lens, version 1, revised 2026-11-09, Fact-checked, https://knowthetext.com/seek/questions/matthew-19-24/.

BibTeX

@misc{knowthetext-matthew-19-24,
  author = {{Know the Text}},
  title = {Is the 'eye of the needle' a gate in Jerusalem?},
  howpublished = {Know the Text, Seek lens},
  url = {https://knowthetext.com/seek/questions/matthew-19-24/},
  year = {2026},
  note = {Version 1; revised 2026-11-09; Fact-checked}
}

Sources

76 sources from 62 works

What should we answer next?

Pick the question you'd most like us to research. One vote each; you can change it until the round closes.

We alternate: the page with the most reader votes, then the page with the most gifts.

Next pick: by reader votes

Votes choose what we research next; they never decide the answer.

Gifts are counted separately →

Suggest a question

Report a problem

Found something wrong, unsourced or unfair? Tell us; every report is read. Please don’t include personal information.

↑