Library›Gospel of Peter
Gospel of Peter
A gospel fragment in which soldiers see towering men emerge from the tomb, followed by a cross that speaks.1 2
fact-checked · Version 2 · Revised 2026-11-08
research: Claude Opus 5.5 (research ledger)check: GPT Sol (cross-vendor fact check)writing: GPT SolFact-checked, not yet reviewed by a person.
At a glance
- Written
- About AD 150 or later in M. R. James's judgment; the Catholic Encyclopedia allows an earlier second-century date.3 4
- Genre
- Death and resurrection narrative.5 sources5 sources7. (tr.)8. (tr.)9. Mark 15:341. (tr.)2. 1 Peter 3:19
Summary
Soldiers witness the resurrection in this gospel: towering figures leave the tomb, followed by a speaking cross. The surviving fragment begins during Jesus' trial and breaks off as Peter and his companions take their nets to the sea. The speaker identifies himself as Simon Peter. M. R. James reads the trial narrative as shifting blame onto Jews and clearing Pilate.13 sources13 sources1. (tr.)2. 1 Peter 3:1912. (tr.)13. Matthew 27:62–6614. (tr.)15. Matthew 27:2416. Luke 23:7–123. James5. (tr.)6. (tr.)7. (tr.)8. (tr.)9. Mark 15:34
Contents
Herod's order and Jesus' death
Chapters 1–5Herod orders Jesus handed over. On the cross Jesus is described as silent and apparently without pain; his final cry addresses his power, followed by his being taken up.7 sources7 sources14. (tr.)15. Matthew 27:2416. Luke 23:7–123. James7. (tr.)8. (tr.)9. Mark 15:34
Soldiers witness a startling emergence
Chapters 8–11Petronius and his soldiers guard the tomb, which is closed with seven seals. The soldiers see three men emerge, two supporting a third, followed by a cross that answers a heavenly voice.4 sources4 sources12. (tr.)13. Matthew 27:62–661. (tr.)2. 1 Peter 3:19
Peter goes back to his nets
Gospel of Peter 14:60Peter, Andrew and Levi head to the sea with their nets. The surviving text breaks off there.5 6
Stories
The cross answers
Gospel of Peter 10:39–42Two figures reaching heaven support a third who reaches beyond it. A cross follows them and answers a voice asking about preaching to the dead.1 2
The report is silenced
Gospel of Peter 11:46–49The Jewish leaders ask Pilate to silence the soldiers, fearing they will be stoned by the people. Pilate declares himself clear of Jesus' blood.17 15
Connections to the Bible
Echoes and allusions
- Revelation 5:1 · Gospel of Peter 8:33medium confidence
Quarles proposes that the tomb's seven seals echo Revelation's sealed scroll.18 19 20
- 1 Peter 3:19 · Gospel of Peter 10:41–42low confidence
The Gospel of Peter's preaching to the dead offers a possible parallel to 1 Peter 3:19.1 2
- John 21:1–3 · Gospel of Peter 14:60low confidence
The return to fishing suggests a lakeside scene like John 21, but the fragment ends before an appearance.5 6
Expansions
- Matthew 27:62–66 · Gospel of Peter 8:30–33medium confidence
Both gospels describe guards protecting the tomb against theft by disciples and a suppressed report. Evangelical scholar Charles Quarles argues that the Gospel of Peter's shared theft wording shows dependence on Matthew, including Matthew 28:11–15.7 sources7 sources12. (tr.)13. Matthew 27:62–6617. (tr.)15. Matthew 27:2418. Matthew 27:6419. (tr.)20. Quarles
Shared figures
- Matthew 13:55 · Origen's report about the book
The early Greek Christian commentator Origen reports an explanation of Jesus' brothers as Joseph's children by an earlier wife, citing this gospel or the Book of James. That material is absent from the surviving fragment.21 22
Contrasts
- Matthew 27:24 · Gospel of Peter 1:1–2
The opening contrasts others' failure to wash their hands with Pilate's implied handwashing; Herod orders the handover. Compare Herod's examination in Luke 23:6–12 and Pilate's later declaration in this fragment.5 sources5 sources14. (tr.)15. Matthew 27:2416. Luke 23:7–123. James17. (tr.)
- Mark 15:34 · Gospel of Peter 5:19
Jesus addresses his power in this account's final cry, differing from the address to God in Mark 15:34 and Matthew 27:46.7 8 9
Where each church stands
Gospel of Peter Full table →
- Catholic
- Not included25
- Greek Orthodox
- Not included
The OSB contents list only the 27 NT books.
Confidence: medium26 - Russian (Slavonic) Orthodox
- Not included
No Russian NT source was read beyond the azbyka contents, which list the 27 books.
Confidence: medium27 - Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo
- Not included
Not in either of Cowley's NT lists (27 books, or 35 with the church-order books).
28
Why was its authority disputed?
Around AD 200, Serapion of Antioch initially allowed a Gospel of Peter at Rhossus without reading it, then obtained a copy and objected to additions in it. Eusebius later rejected a gospel under Peter's name, as did the Latin Gelasian list. These are particular judgments, within the longer history of varying canon lists described by academic historian Lee Martin McDonald.8 sources8 sources29. Eusebius)30. Eusebius)31. Eusebius)32. Eusebius33. Eusebius34. 1912)35. James36. McDonald 2022
Why it was read
Early church: Greek
Serapion's initial permission shows a local willingness to read the book. Even after investigating it, he found much that agreed with what he regarded as true doctrine.29 30 31
Catholic
The Catholic Encyclopedia defends the recovered fragment against a plainly heretical reading, while acknowledging that some passages permit that interpretation.4
Misconceptions
Myth Constantine had this gospel removed at Nicaea.
Actually: Reformed writer Michael Kruger rejects the claim that Constantine or Nicaea decided the New Testament canon. Serapion's objections to a Gospel of Peter already belong to around AD 200.4 sources4 sources39. Kruger 201329. Eusebius)30. Eusebius)31. Eusebius)
Myth The surviving fragment plainly teaches that Jesus only seemed to suffer.
Actually: M. R. James reads the fragment as docetic, casting doubt on Jesus' real suffering and human body. The Catholic Encyclopedia finds no marked heresy, though it allows that some passages can bear such a meaning.3 4
Myth The fragment’s relationship to the four canonical gospels is settled.
Actually: Academic writer M. R. James held that it used all four gospels. As reported by evangelical scholar Charles Quarles, critical scholar John Dominic Crossan instead proposed an earlier source behind all four death and resurrection accounts. Alan Kirk describes longstanding scholarly disagreement over dependence.4 sources4 sources3. James20. Quarles40. Kirk41. Kirk
Further reading
- The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford, 1924) · M. R. James3
- Eusebius, Church History VI.12 (NPNF2 1, New Advent) · Serapion of Antioch (in Eusebius)29
- Apocrypha (Catholic Encyclopedia, 1907)4
- Examining Priorities (NTS) · Alan Kirk41
Sources
41 sources from 26 works
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924)
- 1
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 12
- 14
- 17
- 19
- 2
M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford, 1924)
- 3
- 11
- 35
- 4
- 9
- 10
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
Serapion of Antioch (in Eusebius), Eusebius, Church History VI.12 (NPNF2 1, New Advent)
- 29
- 30
- 31
Eusebius, Church History III (NPNF2 1, New Advent)
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History (tr. A. C. McGiffert, NPNF2 vol. 1), via New Advent (1890)
- 37
- 383.25.6-7↩
- 39
Alan Kirk, “Examining Priorities (NTS)”
- 40note 10↩
- 41
- 40
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.10.39-GosPet.10.42 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
1 Peter 3:19
19in whom He also went and preached to the spirits in prison
M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford, 1924), Gospel of Peter, introduction
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.14.60 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.7.26 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.4.10-GosPet.4.11 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.5.19 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
Mark 15:34
34At the ninth hour, Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” which means, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken Me?”
Alan Kirk, “Examining Priorities: Another Look at the Gospel of Peter's Relationship to the New Testament Gospels (NTS)”, opening extract
M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford, 1924), Gospel of Peter, introduction, p. 90
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.8.30-GosPet.8.33 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.1.1-GosPet.1.2 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
Matthew 27:24
24When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but that instead a riot was breaking out, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “You bear the responsibility.”
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.11.46-GosPet.11.49 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
Matthew 27:64
64So give the order that the tomb be secured until the third day. Otherwise, His disciples may come and steal Him away and tell the people He has risen from the dead. And this last deception would be worse than the first.”
M. R. James (tr.), Gospel of Peter (M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament, 1924), GosPet.8.30 (hosted in our DB as work james-ant)
Charles Quarles, “The Gospel of Peter (NAMB Apologetics Blog)”
Origen, Commentary on Matthew, Book X (ANF 9, New Advent), X.17
Richard Bauckham, “The Relatives of Jesus (Themelios 21.2, 1996)”, note 5
Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion (1571), Article VI, as printed in E. J. Bicknell, A Theological Introduction to the Thirty-Nine Articles (1919)
Council of Trent, Session IV (8 April 1546), Decree concerning the canonical Scriptures
The Orthodox Study Bible (Thomas Nelson, 2008), front matter (contents, introduction, canon table)
Russian Synodal Bible, as published by Azbuka Very (azbyka.ru): contents and chapter notes
R. W. Cowley, 'The Biblical Canon of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church Today', Ostkirchliche Studien 23 (1974) 318–323
Serapion of Antioch (in Eusebius), Eusebius, Church History VI.12 (NPNF2 1, New Advent), 6.12.3-6
Serapion of Antioch (in Eusebius), Eusebius, Church History VI.12 (NPNF2 1, New Advent), 6.12.6
Serapion of Antioch (in Eusebius), Eusebius, Church History VI.12 (NPNF2 1, New Advent), 6.12.3
Decretum Gelasianum (tr. Roger Pearse from von Dobschütz 1912), Decretum Gelasianum de libris recipiendis et non recipiendis, V, list of apocryphal books
M. R. James, The Apocryphal New Testament (Oxford, 1924), Lost Heretical Books
Lee Martin McDonald, “The New Testament Canon (Bible Odyssey, SBL)” (2022)
Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History (tr. A. C. McGiffert, NPNF2 vol. 1), via New Advent (1890), 3.25.7
Eusebius of Caesarea, Church History (tr. A. C. McGiffert, NPNF2 vol. 1), via New Advent (1890), 3.25.6-7
Michael J. Kruger, “Ten Basic Facts about the NT Canon: #8 (Canon Fodder blog)” (2013)