Library›Gospel of Philip
Gospel of Philip
Reflections on Christian rituals and spiritual union, including the damaged passage about Mary Magdalene's kiss often cited in claims about Jesus' marriage.9 sources9 sources1. Laflèche2. Ehrman3. Mattison)4. Mattison)5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman8. Laflèche9. Ehrman
fact-checked · Version 2 · Revised 2026-11-08
research: Claude Opus 5.5 (research ledger)check: GPT Sol (cross-vendor fact check)writing: GPT SolFact-checked, not yet reviewed by a person.
Mark M. Mattison's translation ↗ · Public-domain translation.
Wesley W. Isenberg's translation ↗ · The kiss passage prints mouth, a conjectural restoration of a gap.
At a glance
Summary
Readers looking for a story of Jesus and Mary Magdalene encounter sayings and reflections on Christian rituals and spiritual union instead. Alongside the damaged kiss passage, Philip discusses baptism, anointing, Eucharist, redemption and the bridal chamber. Emily Laflèche associates it with the school of Valentinus, a second-century Christian teacher. She describes the bridal chamber as a ritual theme of human and divine union; its precise practice, including a possible sexual element, is uncertain. Philip's references to Mary do not establish a marriage.9 sources9 sources5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman1. Laflèche2. Ehrman3. Mattison)4. Mattison)8. Laflèche9. Ehrman
Contents
A disputed account of conception
Codex page 55The book rejects conception by the Holy Spirit, asking how one woman could conceive by another, while also affirming Mary's undefiled virginity.13 14 15
Mary as companion
Pages 59 and 63–64Mary Magdalene is called Jesus' companion. A damaged passage is commonly reconstructed as describing his special love for her and repeated kisses; the disciples ask why he loves her more.5 sources5 sources16. Mattison)17. Isenberg)5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman
Rituals and reunion
Pages 67–70The book names five mysteries, or sacred rites. It links baptism, redemption and the bridal chamber with the temple's holy places, and describes death and reunion through the separation of male and female.3 1 4
The cross and the anointing
Pages 73–74Philip is quoted telling how Joseph planted the trees used for Jesus' cross. The collection also places anointing above baptism and connects the Christian name with that anointing.12 18
Stories
A kiss with missing words
Page 63, lines 33–36The familiar reading about love and repeated kissing involves restoration of damaged text. Mouth is itself a proposed restoration of a gap; critical historian Bart Ehrman regards the missing body part as unknowable.5 sources5 sources5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman19. Isenberg)11. Hixson
Joseph's trees
Page 73The saying attributed to Philip connects Joseph's carpentry with Jesus' cross by making Joseph the planter of its trees.12
Connections to the Bible
Echoes and allusions
- Matthew 27:51 · Page 70medium confidence
Philip uses the torn temple veil, also described in Mark 15:38, as an image of ascent from below to above.4 sources4 sources4. Mattison)20. Matthew 27:5121. Mattison)22. Matthew 3:15
- Matthew 3:15 · Pages 72–73medium confidence
Philip’s partially restored wording about fulfilling righteousness parallels Matthew 3:15.4 sources4 sources4. Mattison)20. Matthew 27:5121. Mattison)22. Matthew 3:15
Contrasts
- Matthew 1:18 · Page 55medium confidence
Philip disputes conception by the Holy Spirit, contrasting with Matthew 1:18 and Luke 1:35, while still affirming Mary's virginity.13 14 15
Why read it, and how is scriptural authority assessed?
Philip's title does not authenticate apostolic authorship: the author is unidentified, and Philip appears once as someone quoted. Laflèche's account places its composition in the late second or early third century and associates it with Valentinian Christianity. For the broader canon process, early Latin church writer Augustine weighed reception among churches, while evangelical scholar Roger Nicole stresses apostolic origin. Those general criteria help frame the question; they are not records of a decision about this particular work.4 sources4 sources12. Mattison)1. Laflèche23. Shaw) 188724. Nicole 1997
Why readers value it
Academic (critical)
Karen King values Philip as evidence for an early Christian portrait of Mary Magdalene as a favored disciple and companion.25
General criteria for Scripture
Protestant: evangelical
Roger Nicole gives apostolic origin fundamental, though not exclusive, significance in canonicity. Philip's unidentified authorship leaves its title unable to establish that connection.24 12
Early church: Latin
Augustine's general rule prefers books received across churches and weighs the authority of those receiving them. A book's apostolic title alone does not meet that reception criterion.23
Misconceptions
Myth Philip says Jesus married Mary Magdalene.
Actually: Ehrman argues that companion does not by itself mean spouse and reads the kiss as transmission of revelation. Evangelical scholar Elijah Hixson stresses that mouth fills a hole in the manuscript.5 sources5 sources7. Ehrman16. Mattison)25. King19. Isenberg)11. Hixson
Further reading
- The Gospel of Philip · Emily Laflèche1
- Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Sexual Innuendos · Bart D. Ehrman7
- In Depth: Dr Elijah Hixson · Elijah Hixson11
Sources
25 sources from 13 works
Emily Laflèche, “The Gospel of Philip”
- 1
- 8
Bart D. Ehrman, “Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Sexual Innuendos”
- 2
- 7
- 9
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 12
- 13
- 16
- 18NHC II p. 74↩
- 21
- 10
- 11
- 14
- 15
Gospel of Philip (tr. Wesley W. Isenberg), The Gospel of Philip
- 17NHC II 59.6-11, Gnostic Society Library↩
- 19
- 17
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
Emily Laflèche, “The Gospel of Philip”, e-Clavis: Christian Apocrypha (NASSCAL)
Bart D. Ehrman, “Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Sexual Innuendos”, The Bart Ehrman Blog (reposting Peter, Paul, and Mary Magdalene, 2006)
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 67
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 70
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II pp. 63-64
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 64
Bart D. Ehrman, “Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Sexual Innuendos”, The Bart Ehrman Blog
Emily Laflèche, “The Gospel of Philip”, e-Clavis: Christian Apocrypha (NASSCAL), reception
Bart D. Ehrman, “Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Sexual Innuendos”, The Bart Ehrman Blog, quoting The Da Vinci Code p. 246
Andrew Bernhard and Mark M. Mattison, “Manuscript Information”, gospels.net, Nag Hammadi Codex II, Tractate 3
Elijah Hixson, “In Depth: Dr Elijah Hixson”, Evangelicals Now
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 73
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 55
Matthew 1:18
18This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about: His mother Mary was pledged in marriage to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be with child through the Holy Spirit.
Luke 1:35
35The angel replied, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the Holy One to be born will be called the Son of God.
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 59
Gospel of Philip (tr. Wesley W. Isenberg), The Gospel of Philip, NHC II 59.6-11, Gnostic Society Library
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II p. 74
Gospel of Philip (tr. Wesley W. Isenberg), The Gospel of Philip, NHC II 63.32-36, Gnostic Society Library
Matthew 27:51
51At that moment the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth quaked and the rocks were split.
Gospel of Philip (tr. Mark M. Mattison), The Gospel of Philip: a public domain translation, NHC II pp. 72-73
Matthew 3:15
15“Let it be so now,” Jesus replied. “It is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness in this way.” Then John permitted Him.
Augustine of Hippo (tr. J. F. Shaw), On Christian Doctrine book 2 (NPNF1 vol. 2), via New Advent (1887), 2.8.12
Roger Nicole, “The Canon of the New Testament, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 40.2 (1997) 199-206” (1997)
Karen L. King, “Women in Ancient Christianity: the New Discoveries”, PBS Frontline, From Jesus to Christ (1998)