Know the Text⌕

Reading as Seek: to learn Scripture and its teachings. Same facts, warmer framing.

Library›Gospel of Philip

Gospel of Philip

Reflections on Christian rituals and spiritual union, including the damaged passage about Mary Magdalene's kiss often cited in claims about Jesus' marriage.9 sources9 sources1. Laflèche2. Ehrman3. Mattison)4. Mattison)5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman8. Laflèche9. Ehrman

fact-checked · Version 2 · Revised 2026-11-08research: Claude Opus 5.5 (research ledger)check: GPT Sol (cross-vendor fact check)writing: GPT Sol

Fact-checked, not yet reviewed by a person.

Mark M. Mattison's translation ↗ · Public-domain translation.

Wesley W. Isenberg's translation ↗ · The kiss passage prints mouth, a conjectural restoration of a gap.

At a glance

Genre
Sayings and reflections, including 17 sayings of Jesus.1 2
Written
Late second or early third century, in Emily Laflèche's account.1
Language
Preserved in Coptic; Laflèche reports a presumed Greek original.10 11 1
Author
Unidentified; Philip is quoted once, which does not establish him as author.12
Found in
Nag Hammadi Codex II, pages 51–86, with local gaps.10 11

Summary

Readers looking for a story of Jesus and Mary Magdalene encounter sayings and reflections on Christian rituals and spiritual union instead. Alongside the damaged kiss passage, Philip discusses baptism, anointing, Eucharist, redemption and the bridal chamber. Emily Laflèche associates it with the school of Valentinus, a second-century Christian teacher. She describes the bridal chamber as a ritual theme of human and divine union; its precise practice, including a possible sexual element, is uncertain. Philip's references to Mary do not establish a marriage.9 sources9 sources5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman1. Laflèche2. Ehrman3. Mattison)4. Mattison)8. Laflèche9. Ehrman

Contents

  1. A disputed account of conception

    Codex page 55

    The book rejects conception by the Holy Spirit, asking how one woman could conceive by another, while also affirming Mary's undefiled virginity.13 14 15

  2. Mary as companion

    Pages 59 and 63–64

    Mary Magdalene is called Jesus' companion. A damaged passage is commonly reconstructed as describing his special love for her and repeated kisses; the disciples ask why he loves her more.5 sources5 sources16. Mattison)17. Isenberg)5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman

  3. Rituals and reunion

    Pages 67–70

    The book names five mysteries, or sacred rites. It links baptism, redemption and the bridal chamber with the temple's holy places, and describes death and reunion through the separation of male and female.3 1 4

  4. The cross and the anointing

    Pages 73–74

    Philip is quoted telling how Joseph planted the trees used for Jesus' cross. The collection also places anointing above baptism and connects the Christian name with that anointing.12 18

Stories

  • A kiss with missing words

    Page 63, lines 33–36

    The familiar reading about love and repeated kissing involves restoration of damaged text. Mouth is itself a proposed restoration of a gap; critical historian Bart Ehrman regards the missing body part as unknowable.5 sources5 sources5. Mattison)6. Mattison)7. Ehrman19. Isenberg)11. Hixson

  • Joseph's trees

    Page 73

    The saying attributed to Philip connects Joseph's carpentry with Jesus' cross by making Joseph the planter of its trees.12

Connections to the Bible

Why read it, and how is scriptural authority assessed?

Philip's title does not authenticate apostolic authorship: the author is unidentified, and Philip appears once as someone quoted. Laflèche's account places its composition in the late second or early third century and associates it with Valentinian Christianity. For the broader canon process, early Latin church writer Augustine weighed reception among churches, while evangelical scholar Roger Nicole stresses apostolic origin. Those general criteria help frame the question; they are not records of a decision about this particular work.4 sources4 sources12. Mattison)1. Laflèche23. Shaw) 188724. Nicole 1997

Why readers value it

Academic (critical)

Karen King values Philip as evidence for an early Christian portrait of Mary Magdalene as a favored disciple and companion.25

Academic (critical)

Emily Laflèche's account makes its reflections on the bridal chamber useful for studying Valentinian ritual thought, while leaving the precise practice uncertain.1 4

General criteria for Scripture

Protestant: evangelical

Roger Nicole gives apostolic origin fundamental, though not exclusive, significance in canonicity. Philip's unidentified authorship leaves its title unable to establish that connection.24 12

Early church: Latin

Augustine's general rule prefers books received across churches and weighs the authority of those receiving them. A book's apostolic title alone does not meet that reception criterion.23

Misconceptions

  • Myth Philip says Jesus married Mary Magdalene.

    Actually: Ehrman argues that companion does not by itself mean spouse and reads the kiss as transmission of revelation. Evangelical scholar Elijah Hixson stresses that mouth fills a hole in the manuscript.5 sources5 sources7. Ehrman16. Mattison)25. King19. Isenberg)11. Hixson

Further reading

Sources

25 sources from 13 works

Report a problem

Found something wrong, unsourced or unfair? Tell us; every report is read. Please don’t include personal information.

↑